California Proposition 8: Reactions from opponents of same-sex marriage


Reactions from opponents of same-sex marriage to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision to strike down Proposition 8:

Alan Sears, President of the Alliance Defense Fund:

“Let me remind you that like all the stages in this battle that the Alliance Defense Fund has been involved in for years we’ve had lots of ups, we’ve had lots of downs. We’ve had times like today that people got very discouraged – they thought the battle was over. And then we’ve had times when it started all over again – we’ve made great progress…It’s far from over.”


Randy Thomasson, President of

“God created a man and a woman to fit together in marriage. The People of California have twice affirmed this beautiful, natural, and exclusive pro-family institution between a husband and wife, a man and a woman. The Ninth Circuit ruling to strike down man-woman marriage, by a Carter judge and a Clinton judge, is unfair to the voters, against our republic, against our democratic system, against the United States Constitution, against Nature, and against God and His beneficial design of family.

“It’s illogical and unconstitutional to claim that natural, unchangeable race and ethnicity is the same as sexual behavior. That’s not fair or true. Race and ethnicity are inherited, but science has never found homosexuality, bisexuality, or transsexuality to be inherited or unchangeable. Neither is this about commitment. As the divorce of leading anti-Prop. 8 lesbians Robin Tyler and Diane Olson demonstrates, the notion of homosexual ‘marriage’ is not really about ‘commitment,’ but is a political agenda forcing acceptance of homosexuality upon the children of America. Yet nothing is equal to marriage between a man and a woman. If you don’t have a man and a woman, you don’t have marriage.

“Judicial activists like Stephen Reinhardt and Michael Daly Hawkins need to be reined in like Newt Gingrich has been saying about judicial activists. Marriage is not in the United States Constitution, so this case should never have gone to federal court. Now it will be appealed to the nation’s high court, with Anthony Kennedy being the deciding vote. Fortunately, in past rulings favoring homosexuality, Kennedy has written against redefining marriage, making it likely that he will affirm California’s right to reserve marriage licenses for ‘a man and a woman.'”


Learn More:


3 Comments on “California Proposition 8: Reactions from opponents of same-sex marriage

  1. Pingback: California Proposition 8: Ninth Circuit rules ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional | What The Folly?!

  2. Pingback: California Proposition 8: Reactions from supporters of same-sex marriage | What The Folly?!

  3. Pingback: California Proposition 8: Timeline of Perry v. Brown (Schwarzenegger) | What The Folly?!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.